In context: In recent days, Rome’s business community has been buzzing about what the U.S. Senate plans to do regarding conservation easement transactions, described as a very legal way to profit from existing government regulations that allow “inflated appraisals of those tracts of land and grant conservation easements on that land. The resulting inflated charitable deductions are then split among the taxpayers.”
Rome is regarded as a “syndication hot bed” in terms of such investments as referenced in this 2017 article in ProPublica.
In the latest move, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) have sent 14 letters seeking more information on such activity, including at least one chief executive officer with a Rome address.
Below please find the media release from the Senate committee. We’ll have additional updates soon. We invite comments and reaction at firstname.lastname@example.org
Media release: Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) today launched an investigation into the potential abuse of syndicated conservation easement transactions, which may have allowed some taxpayers to profit from gaming the tax code and deprived the federal government of billions of dollars in revenue.
For several years now, the IRS has been investigating these transactions. They appear to involve promoters selling interests in tracts of land to taxpayers looking for large tax deductions. In such an arrangement, the taxpayers then get inflated appraisals of those tracts of land and grant conservation easements on that land. The resulting inflated charitable deductions are then split among the taxpayers.
“There are very legitimate purposes for the conservation easement provisions of the tax code. But when a handful of individuals cook up a scheme to cash in at the expense of federal revenue and in violation of Congress’s intent, something needs to change. There’s no reason that the rest of the taxpaying American public should be left with such a raw deal,” Grassley said. “This is just our first step in getting to the bottom of how these tax provisions are being abused, and it will inform what else ought to be done to fix the problem.”
“Our first concern is preserving the integrity of the conservation easement program, which has helped protect critical habitat across the country. The goal of our bipartisan investigation is to ensure a few bad actors don’t threaten the program by selling off deductions based on exorbitant appraisals. The program must not be abused and used as a lucrative tax shelter for the wealthy,” Wyden said.
Groups of taxpayers appear to have used and continue to use syndicated conservation easements to reap tax benefits greater than their initial investments. These groups of investors will pool resources to buy land and grant conservation easements on it to prevent development. With very little oversight, many of these groups receive extravagantly high appraisals for that land, boosting their tax benefits.
The Brookings Institutionfound that this practice cost the federal government more than $3 billion dollars in 2014 alone, and estimated that it has cost even more in the years since.
In 14 separate letters, Grassley and Wyden sought documents and information from individuals who appear to be associated with these investor groups that might have unfairly profited from conservation easements. The senators are seeking information about the organization, tax code compliance and promotion of the groups from these individuals.
Each of the fourteen letters can be found at the following links: